Dialysis dose in acute kidney injury: no time for therapeutic nihilism – a critical appraisal of the Acute Renal Failure Trial Network study.
Ronco C, Cruz D, Oudemans van Straaten H, Honore P, House A, Bin D, Gibney N. Crit Care. 2008;12(5):308
Related Articles:
- The Hannover Dialysis Outcome study: comparison of standard versus intensified extended dialysis for treatment of patients with acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit
- Adding a Dialysis Dose to Continuous Hemofiltration Increases Survival in Patients with Acute Renal Failure.
- Standard versus High-Dose CVVHDF for ICU-Related Acute Renal Failure.
Abstract:
The optimal dialysis dose for acute kidney injury is a matter of great controversy. Clinical trials, predominantly single-center studies, have shown conflicting results. The Acute Renal Failure Trial Network (ATN) Study was designed to compare clinical outcomes between patients allocated to an intensive dose versus a less-intensive dose of renal replacement therapy. Recently, the results of this large randomized controlled multicenter study were published. The present article will discuss certain aspects of this trial: the overall design, the baseline patient characteristics, and comparison of the results with earlier studies. Finally, the article will address the implications of the ATN Study results for clinical practice.
Recent Comments